[Icc-mot] ImageCraft Blog

[Edward Karpicz]

I also think IDE is good enough. I'm using it and it's good enough as is. Of 
course some things could be improved:
Bookmarks navigation is little odd. No keyboard shortcut for go to bookmark 
window. Go to bookmrak window has odd combobox instead of dozen of 
radioboxes or something. It's fast to jump to one selected bookmark, it's 
slow to select another.
There's no shortcut for switch between two editor tabs. Ctrl-Tab and 
Shift-Ctrl-Tab are not very useful, mouse is better to select one of 5-10 
opened files. But keyboard shortcut for switch between last used 2 tabs 
would be nice.
Terminal window. I like it's integrated, but terminal-download is something. 
It shouldn't use 100% of CPU.
When IDE starts, for some reason it empties whole or a part of defICC12.prj 
in bin folder. When IDE is *normally* closed (and that happens not every 
time because our windows PCs sometimes hang for some reasons) defICC12.prj 
is written back. Tools menu is stored in defICC12.prj. What happens when my 
machine hangs? Right, I lose my tools menu. Try terminating icc12ide.exe 
process and you'll see the same.
Of course compiler, libs, double, printf, XGATE just assembler, far 
pointers, far data were all mentioned in the past enough times to mention it 
again.

Regards
Edward

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Fiocca" <jim at fiocca.net>
To: "Discussion List for ICC08/11/12/16 users. You do NOT need to subscribe 
toicc-announce if you are a member of this." <icc-mot at imagecraft.com>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Icc-mot] ImageCraft Blog


> Not sure if you were looking for feedback on what you wrote on the blog, 
> but I guess I'll give it anyway.
>
> Speaking from a Freescale processor point of view, we all have the option 
> to go to CodeWarrior if we want a big, bloated, full-featured IDE with 
> integrated debugger.  We (I) choose Imagecraft because it is cheaper and 
> less complicated.  I disagree with the whole premise of upgrading the IDE. 
> I'd be happy if the product didn't have an IDE at all (I only use it from 
> the command line, with a Makefile).
>
> I think you should direct your energy into the compiler itself, and adding 
> support for such things as XGATE, for example.
>
> My 2 cents,
> Jim
>
>
> Richard Man wrote:
>> I have started an ImageCraft blog at http://imagecraft.wordpress.com/ 
>> Link will be added to our website soon.
>>
>> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
>> <http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo> On-line orders, support, 
>> and listservers available on web site.
>> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all 
>> previous replies in your msgs. ]
>> _______________________________________________
>> Icc-mot mailing list
>> Icc-mot at imagecraft.com
>> http://dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo/icc-mot
>
> _______________________________________________
> Icc-mot mailing list
> Icc-mot at imagecraft.com
> http://dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo/icc-mot
>