[Icc-mot] GNU to ICC
Edward Karpicz
ekarpicz at freemail.lt
Wed Feb 20 23:40:46 PST 2008
address xxxx already contains a value means linker sees something already
emitted to xxxx address. Something overlaps. Hard to guess what's wrong in
your case. Did you define some custom area or emit code/data to specific
address using #pragma abs_address ? Do you have some pure asm files that
could emit code/data to the wrong area, wrong address?
Edward
----- Original Message -----
From: "Oskar Atkinson" <oskar at atk-it.com>
To: "Discussion List for ICC08/11/12/16 users. You do NOT need
tosubscribetoicc-announce if you are a member of this."
<icc-mot at imagecraft.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:54 AM
Subject: RE: [Icc-mot] GNU to ICC
> That would give me quite a bit more available memory.
>
> As the original code, compiled with GNU, did fit in a MC9S12C64 - I hope
> and expect that the same code ( once finally compiling) compiled with
> ICC will fit as well.
>
> I still am puzzled by the ton of errormessages:
>
>> !E ms2_extra_main.o(2749): Code address 0:0x400b already contains a
>> value
>> !E ms2_extra_main.o(2749): Code address 0:0x400c already contains a
>> value
>> Counting up to
>> !E ms2_extra_main.o(2749): Code address 0:0x6186 already contains a
>
> Basically for every byte I am getting a line.
> IMHO, it has to have some cause - which I am not aware of.
>
>
> ( Using my standard dev environment Visula Objects - I can create such a
> situation of 1000nds of errors. But there I know how to solve it .. )
>
>
> Oskar
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: icc-mot-bounces at imagecraft.com
> [mailto:icc-mot-bounces at imagecraft.com] On Behalf Of Edward Karpicz
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:14 PM
> To: Discussion List for ICC08/11/12/16 users. You do NOT need
> tosubscribetoicc-announce if you are a member of this.
> Subject: Re: [Icc-mot] GNU to ICC
>
> I forgot that C family members, different compared to D's and A's, can
> have linear nonpaged memory area larger than 48k. Good news for you,
> isn't it? I didn't try C64 myself, but if I understand datasheet
> properly, then you can have up to 64-4=60k of linear nonpaged flash. If
> you didn't read in the docs about internal memories priorities, then
> please note that RAM takes precedence over flash. It means when RAM and
> flash addresses do overlap, then RAM is visible and piece of flash,
> covered by RAM block, isn't visible.
> And the next rule - register block has the highest priority. That's why
> 64-4k. INITRM register out of reset is set to 9, so RAM block is at
> 0x0.0xFFF. INITRG register defaults at 0, so register block occupies
> 0x0.0x3FF addresses. So out of reset you have 2k of registers at
> 0x0.0x3FF, 3k of RAM at 0x400.0xFFF, and 60k of flash at 0x1000.0xFFFF.
> If you need all 4k of RAM, then you will have to remap RAM for example
> to 0x1000.0x1FFF, loosing extra kB of flash.
>
> So maybe try changing program memory setting to 0x1000.0xFFFF. If it
> won't fit 60k, then I guess you need more flash and paged memory.
>
>
> Edward
>
> P.S. you may have problems flashing compiled 0x1000.0xFFFF image due to
> possibly lack of support from debugger/programmes. But this is solvable
> converting S records to proper format.
>
>
> Oskar Atkinson wrote:
>
>> Well, looking different now ... :-)
>>
>> However I need to bug you again...
>>
>>>>
>> How much space do you need for your constants? Could your constants
> and
>> all the code into 48k? It would be the best for you, just use nonpaged
>> 0x4000.0xFFFF area.
>> <<
>>
>> Seems it not fitting in 48k,
>>
>> icc12w -o MSIIETXTRA-ICC-2008 -btext:0x4000.0xFFFF -bdata:0x0400
>> -dinit_sp:0x1000 -fmots19 @MSIIETXTRA-ICC-2008.lk
>> !E <library>(200): area 'text' not large enough
>> want size 24967
>> lo 49487 hi 65535 size 16049
>>
>> And then I am getting a gazillion errors:
>>
>> !E ms2_extra_main.o(2749): Code address 0:0x400b already contains a
>> value
>> !E ms2_extra_main.o(2749): Code address 0:0x400c already contains a
>> value
>> Counting up to
>> !E ms2_extra_main.o(2749): Code address 0:0x6186 already contains a
>> value
>>
>>
>> Oskar
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Icc-mot mailing list
>> Icc-mot at imagecraft.com
>> http://dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo/icc-mot
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Icc-mot mailing list
> Icc-mot at imagecraft.com
> http://dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo/icc-mot
>
> _______________________________________________
> Icc-mot mailing list
> Icc-mot at imagecraft.com
> http://dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo/icc-mot
>
More information about the Icc-mot
mailing list