[Icc-avr] Atmel/Meshnetics Zigbee Stack
Thomas Schäfer
schaefer at mabel.info
Thu Sep 27 19:09:46 PDT 2007
Ton, excuse my late reply. I was to busy, to do it earlier.
You are talking about the Jennic-Module, aren't you? Indeed, the Jennic module is a
one-chip solution, but the Meshnetics(Atmel Two Chip) module is smaller, consumes less
power, and utilise a ATM1281. For me, thats enough reasons to port the Atmel Zigbee-Stack
to iccavr.
regards,
Thomas
>
> ZigBee and Blutooth cannot be compared. They are too different
> and serve totally different purposes. As for size and cost look
> again. We are producing a module, based on a single chip solution
> that is far smaller than any blutooth solution out there.
> Currently the unit costs are around $1.50 but we expect it to go
> below $1 soon. And as for power consumption, ZigBee offers a near
> total shutdown in sleep mode. End nodes need to wakeup only when
> they have to, for example when a switchs closes or opens. Our
> open/close sensor units for example, are designed to last well
> over a year on a 3.6 volt button cell. Obviously their real life
> span depends on the number of open/close actions.
>
> Ton
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Icc-avr mailing list
> Icc-avr at imagecraft.com
> http://dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo/icc-avr
More information about the Icc-avr
mailing list